1. emmianuel reblogged this from camelotsheart
  2. kittensandbubbles reblogged this from malfoypotterpoems
  3. jembarrassment reblogged this from yxlenas
  4. nothereforthedrama reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  5. voxsecundus reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  6. timidlygayboy reblogged this from ofelvesandmusings
  7. magmar3 reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  8. ennairea reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  9. mewcoyote reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  10. rainbowmoonbean reblogged this from would-you-like-me-to-try
  11. would-you-like-me-to-try reblogged this from greyramblings
  12. greyramblings reblogged this from ofelvesandmusings
  13. ofelvesandmusings reblogged this from k-911
  14. dragonmarquise reblogged this from thenerdyninja
  15. stealthboy posted this
    the thoughts “weed has many positive uses both medicinally and otherwise, and the criminalization of it is rooted in...
stealthboy greeneggsandtrans

novas-grimoire:

thenerdyninja:

lemonsharks:

As well as “weed smells awful and weed smoke is a migraine and asthma trigger for many people, so it should be subject to the same limitations on cigarette re: public use”

stealthboy:

the thoughts “weed has many positive uses both medicinally and otherwise, and the criminalization of it is rooted in ignorance, racism and classism” and “weed can be harmful and mentally addictive to certain people” can and should coexist

(seriously y'all 420 affidianados don’t get to call it skunk and then pretend it smells nice)

This was one of those posts that summarized my feelings on an issue better than I ever had myself.

May I also add “Weed IS harmful to pets (and I believe small children?) and should not be smoked around them or given to them in any fashion” can exist alongside the above statements?

23 December 2020 at 5:08 AM